It runs on Android 10 and powered by 2.35 inch Helio P35 MT6765 Octa Core Processor. Camon 15 Pro is available in Ice Jadite & Opal White colors at Rs.
- Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 CPU Octa-core, Quad-core 2.3 GHz Cortex-A53, Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 GPU PowerVR GE8320 Display. Screen size is measured in inches, diagonally from corner to corner. The 6.5 inches TFT capacitive touch screen with 720 x 1560 px resolution is multitouch capable. Technology TFT Size 6.5 inches Resolution 720 x 1560.
- MediaTek Helio P35 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 A 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. 64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. It also allows you to run 64-bit apps.
- Dimensions: 74.46 x 162.04 x 9.11 mm Weight: 197 g SoC: MediaTek Helio P35 (MT6765) CPU: 4x 2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53, 4x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53, Cores: 8 GPU: PowerVR GE8320, 680 MHz RAM: 4 GB, 1866 MHz Storage: 128 GB Memory cards: microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC Display: 6.47 in, IPS, 720 x 1560 pixels, 24 bit Battery: 5000 mAh, Li-Polymer OS: FunTouch OS 10 (Android 10).
VS
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 850 (with Mali-G52 MP1 graphics) and MediaTek Helio P35 (IMG PowerVR GE8320). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
Single and multi-core processor tests
19
19
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
10
6
Efficiency of battery consumption
73
52
Overall chip score
32
26
Main differences and advantages of each chip
- Has a smaller size transistor (8 versus 12 nm)
- Announced 1-year and 5-months later
- Shows better (up to 28%) AnTuTu 8 score – 128K vs 100K
- Higher GPU frequency (~21%)
Pros of MediaTek Helio P35
- Performs 72% better in floating-point computations
- 15% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2000 MHz)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksThe AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
128256
100040
| CPU | 47319 | 44240 |
| GPU | 20564 | 11001 |
| Memory | 35627 | 27983 |
| UX | 21661 | 15002 |
| Total score | 128256 | 100040 |
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
153
170
936
974
| Image compression | - | 66.55 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | - | 9.05 images/s |
| Speech recognition | - | 16.55 words/s |
| Machine learning | - | 13.15 images/s |
| Camera shooting | - | 5.63 images/s |
| HTML 5 | - | 1.3 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | - | 319.2 Krows/s |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 850 and Helio P35| Architecture | 8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 | 8x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Instruction set | - | ARMv8-A |
| Process | 8 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP | 7 W | 5 W |
| GPU name | Mali-G52 MP1 | IMG PowerVR GE8320 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 820 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 2 |
| Shading units | 96 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 26 Gigaflops | 44.8 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Mediatek Helio P35 (mt6765v/cb) Processor
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | - | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Neural processor (NPU) | No | No |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2400 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 22MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 25MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| Announced | May 2020 | December 2018 |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Model number | - | MT6765 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 850 official site | MediaTek Helio P35 official site |
So, which SoC would you choose?
216 (77.1%)
64 (22.9%)
Mediatek Helio P35 (mt6765) Vs Snapdragon
Total votes: 280
2.Samsung Exynos 9611 and Samsung Exynos 850
4.HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Samsung Exynos 850
6.Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G and MediaTek Helio P35
8.Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 and MediaTek Helio P35
Mediatek Mt6765 Helio P35 12nm
10.MediaTek Helio G80 and MediaTek Helio P35